
Her paper, “Sibling Configurations, Educational Aspiration and Attainment,” published in March, used data on 1,503 sibling groups and 3,532 individuals from the British Household Panel Study, which was carried out by the University of Essex for the purpose of economic and social research. It found that firstborn children were 7 percent more likely than younger siblings to pursue higher education — and that firstborn girls were 13 percent more ambitious than their male counterparts.
“Despite the volume of literature in this area, the debate over birth order effects remains unresolved,” Bu writes in the study, “due partly to criticisms about the types of data and the analytic methodologies employed.” Previous studies, particularly those in Norway, Denmark, and the Netherlands, found that firstborn children are more likely to succeed, she notes. Bu’s research went further to suggest that the advantage could be partly explained by the finding that firstborn children are likely more ambitious than younger siblings.
Similar studies have mainly focused on differences between families, Bu notes, while her research — which excludes families with just one child or with only twins — looks at intra-family comparisons between siblings; it also looks at the role of birth order in an individual’s educational aspirations, starting at adolescence.
PS: Need more than study stats for inspiration? Some more concrete examples of high-achieving firstborn females include Hillary Clinton, Sheryl Sandberg, and J.K. Rowling. But, of course, middle children — like Madonna and Julia Roberts — have also been shown to be most successful. So be inspired (or dejected) by this latest finding at your own risk.
No comments:
Post a Comment